...mer pressekonferanse:
Minded to change anything at home?
I know you have to ask the question and I have to answer, but normally when someone asks, imagining one answer, what we should change?
[Players or the system?]
The game consists, in attack and defence. When you attack you create 10 chances more than the opponent, you cannot be sad for the style of the team. I think your question is linked with Nketiah and Bamford together because maybe we can be more efficient with those two players, two goalscorers are in better position to take 10 chances.
We should see which player we take out from the team and which is going to be the result if we take out one player behind the attackers. I answered if we play with two goalscorers, maybe Forshaw or Klich are out of the team, Shackleton, Klich, Adam. I think one centre forward without two midfielders behind him is going to make worse the building of the attack.
If you have two centre forwards in one team which doesn’t create a lot of chances, you cannot take advantage of the results you have. This is my way of thinking, but I’m not sure of my thinking. When Nketiah came on I was thinking about removing Klich with Eddie and Bamford together, Bamford behind, but for this decision I have to be convinced. I am getting to know players like Nketiah. I need to know how I combine both of them. The opponent created 10 chances, we create 15 and we won 2-0. Today they created one chance and drew the match. If you see the difference in chances - 10 to 15. Higher percentage than one to 10. If we want to analyse we are not going to have this talk. What I am saying now is going to be commented as an excess of me talking a lot.
If we don’t talk, we just have to say it was a 1-1 draw and the analysis finishes. The reason I ask journalists if what I saw is different from most of you have seen on the pitch.
How frustrated to drop seven points at home?
Of course, we should have won all the matches.
