Veldig bekymrende:
https://tbrfootball.com/bielsa-issues-disappointing-update-on-bamford-as-leeds-prepare-for-villa/
Da er det å tro på mer spilletid for Gelhardt etter at James har løpt seg tom i kampene - for vi vet jo at James vil starte -
og at Joffy`ER foran køen /Roberts når det byttet skal gjøres.
At Rodrigo burde starte som spiss er jo for meg en selvfølge, men ikke for Marcelo.
Ikke nødvendigvis slik at Gelhardt lenger er bak, nei. Her følger en lengre forklaring på hvorfor han ikke ble byttet inn før vs Newcastle:
Persist with James or time for a more natural option up top?We managed to score six goals prior to the Newcastle game. In the game against Newcastle, we did not manage to score. The player who played the least was Gelhardt. The ones who had minutes in that CF role are Rodrigo, James and Tyler. Evidently, in the last game, we were missing finishing. The problem existed and what's been wondered is what I did the least. I went for James, then Roberts and Rodrigo, after I opted for Gelhardt, Rodrigo and Tyler. The moment we created the least danger was when we played with three central attackers through the main part of our game. What's being demanded from my point of view, the demand is totally justified, is we did not win such an important game, that it was accessible. Every demand has to be argumented. The view is put on Gelhardt, which is the option I did not utilise or used for the least time. I have a lot of arguments. For 15 days prior to Newcastle, Gelhardt had an injury in his ankle. The day prior to Newcastle, something not at all frequent, I organised a small training session to verify if after 15 days without activity, whether he could participate in the game the following day. Something that made me think the Gelhardt situation had to be managed carefully, but the reason he was the last on was because of the four options I had available, James, Rodrigo, Roberts, in that moment I put them in front of him. James in his national team plays as a CF with someone alongside him. Rodrigo and Tyler are original CFs. I insist that was the decision I took most to make with Gelhardt coming on. The decisions you make are if you can verify them. What I did was the decision I made and it's judged. It's judged negatively because I did not get what was necessary. The decision I did not make, that of Gelhardt not coming on, cannot be verified so the demand comes from this. Without considering arguments like those I just mentioned, after the first half nothing had to be modified. You don't modify a team that plays well. The start of the second half, even with less chances, we still dominated. When chance creation lowered I called for Tyler. To attack down the centre with Tyler and Rodrigo. After their goal I went with three CFs on the pitch. I insist that's the moment we created the least danger. It's logical they demand something because I did not do it. What I did not do cannot be verified.