Kanskje må vi fortsatt ta noen steg 'backwards' her?
Boozie er bekymret på GFHCs investorer.
Ut fra det under mistenker Boozie at selv investerings-pengene
har de ikke (selv om de visstnok var i 'escrow')
QUOTE (DiscoJesus @ Oct 10 2012, 10:27 AM)
Wasn't the issue that Bates had taken too long and driven the investors off? Now it's GFH's fault? There's no consistent through-line here.
Some of them were frustrated at Bates but some of them also lay the blame at the door of GFH. It would appear (as we all know) that this deal has been a calamitous affair, with neither coming out with much credit at all.
QUOTE (Leeds & Proud Of It @ Oct 10 2012, 10:40 AM)
I've given up worrying about it now. I can understand exactly what GFH Capital are bringing to the table - like bangkokwhite is explaining in incredibly simple terms THEY ARE A PRIVATE EQUITY FIRM. It's a complete irrelevance what their cash in hand situation is - they will have clients who will happily invest into the equity fund.
But they don't they are still bloody looking!
QUOTE (StockportWhite @ Oct 10 2012, 10:47 AM)
Boozie - do you know 100% that the investors have walked for good. If so, is that all of them?
BIG - twist in the tale still (as in yesterdays piggy pic!)
I am aware that 3 investors (wealthy) have walked. I am also aware GFH have been approaching other individuals (even this week) asking them to invest.
It doesn't strike me that the deal could happen today as they are still looking for the cash to put in the pot so they can mange and run the investment. Perhaps this is why Haigh said "within 3 weeks"?
QUOTE (LUFC92tom @ Oct 10 2012, 10:54 AM)
Alot, me included have put alot of trust in Boozies info this horrible summer, but they now appear very confused, so we need clarity on whether he/she is actually in the know enough anymore or is it just opinion from him/her!
(Even the fact I have to type he/she is f**kin ridiculous)
It is not my opinion, I have had this information provided to me first hand by:
1. Some members of the professional teams on both sides of the deal;and
2. Direct from someone who was approached (on Monday) by GFH about investing money.
All I have done (and I explain this again and again) is pass this information on, it is up to you what you do with it. I have never said I am ITK, I am not involved in the deal but have some very good contacts who are. I always make sure info comes from more than one contact before I pass it on because if I was getting info from one source I simply couldn't trust it wasn't "a line".