Hvis man leser alt om takeover'en og i utgangspunktet tror alt som blir skrevet, så er det klart det blir kaos/tøysete/forvrrende m.m.
...men etter å ha fulgt med i tråden (TOMA-tråden) en stund lærer man seg stort sett hvem man kan stole på. I dag (tidlig) har booze og BIG (joda, det er flere som har troverdighet), men for å ta de to som eksempel, fastslått at
QUOTE (boozie @ Aug 14 2012, 07:55 AM)
1. Point of no return was my view based on experience. Everything was agreed, DD complete a position I knew Bates would find very difficult to back out of due to pressures on him from buyers/Harvey/lust/fans/wife. There were minor things to resolve but then last week Bates did his best to turn back or at least squeeze for more cash.
2. I've never said it was imminent, I've never put a time frame on it.
3. Business had changed, I can't tell you why because if someone read this from lufc/my employer they could work out who I am but it was in reference to Harvey. I was not suggesting that it had gone through merely that strategy of lufc had changed.
I am sorry if you took my words differently, I have always erred on the side of caution and clarified where I can. I've only been trying to pass on information I have become privy to.
cheers boozie
QUOTE (billyisgod @ Aug 14 2012, 08:17 AM)
ladies and gents following on from what boozie has said we can only confirm that talks are ongoing and as we said last week are delicately poised, we are told the buyers are very confident as we said on Friday and we believe that at this present moment in time its best if we keep a dignified silence and allow those talking to get on with it.
i would ask that you respect that and (yes i know your sick of it) be patient please?
thanks big
...og er på en 'dignified silence' som noen morroklumper har døpt det.
Om dagens rapporter (tilsynelatende ) fra ER så aner jeg ikke sannhetsgestalten i de...
