Hva skal man si..... Selv om Bates på lørdag sa på LUTV at vi nærmet oss conclusion ser det ikke veeeldig nær forestående for tiden.1. Først. Her har Gary Cooper i dag prøvd å legge frem sin egen forståelse av hvordan ting ligger an.
QUOTE (Nelson7 @ Sep 25 2012, 09:43 AM)
can you explain that in simple laymans terms please pal??
Brokers + consortium (made up of several groups and individuals from various middle eastern locations) = first approach and bid = exclusivity deal in June.
Walker Morris + Club negotiating terms.
Bates + his own legal team = terms become moveable and unstable.
Walker Morris/Club + Brokers + Consortium + Bates + his own legal team now form three parts to a deal origninally between two parties.
Time ticks by + transfer window and real opportunity lost = frustration on many parts of the buying side + silence from Bates.
Supporters ramp up pressure = pen for ken + demonstrations.
Local media ramp up pressure = Phil Hay + Dom Matteo.
Bates suddenly sorry for missing transfer window and close to deal with a banking organisation and alleged American = all parties now vying for position with outcome far more likely sooner rather than later as at least one party likely to concede to Bates demands.
all of this equals new owners and an opportunity to at last effect change we have been crying out for if not the campaign continues with many strong players still in powerfull positions.
thats my take, not a trust statement or opinion, just me on my own
Her 'innrømmer' altså Cooper at det èr amerikanere inne på banen (igjen), gjerne de samme som var på Elland Road i våres (?)Så, nå i kveld er det igjen lyd fra Boozie:
Først en replikk til noe Cooper skreiv:
QUOTE (billyisgod @ Sep 25 2012, 09:30 AM)
what we understand is there has been a lot of shifting of positions of the players involved in this mate, we dont know the specifics but during the last week or two as boozie has pointed out the actual positions within structures and individuals involved seems to have moved around a lot.
were trying to get some clarification.
Just want to echo this post. This is not straight forward and appears to be changing from day to day, with two keys players in and out of the deal and a third waiting and watching. It appears GFH have resurrected their bid but I do not know any details as to how and in what manner. I am told however, that their "arrogance might be a little misplaced". I am currently working away so I am finding it difficult to get to the bottom of things. I will post when I can what I can. QUOTE (Sunshine @ Sep 25 2012, 04:53 PM)
It seems like it is going to keep dragging on.
3 players? Yanks, GFH and a consortium from the Middle East?
Are GFH related in some way to the consortium?
Are the yanks the ones waiting for now and won't they have to do due diligence themselves?
Yes
They were, the question is if they still are or if both parties going it alone.
Yes, they don't have to but they would be stupid not to! QUOTE (YeBullen @ Sep 25 2012, 04:55 PM)
We thought GFH were only ever brokers - so how can they have resurrected 'their bid'?...
Yebullen.
They were but when I said that I meant resurrected their involvement. However, believe they are now actually bidding as their own entity. As I said it is changing daily. QUOTE (billyisgod @ Sep 25 2012, 04:58 PM)
gents really dont panic, just stay calm and be patient, the players that can play are in a position to do so and whilst it might look all complicated and drawn out if fact as Bates himself said we are at an advanced stage, fear the worst by all means but my glass is so half full i just want to cuddle it a little while longer before i take a sip
not cryptic by the way, i really do like my glass
This. (betyr noe sånt som 'enig' eller 'dette er det viktige" Så, hva skal man si?
Ser iallefall ut som Bates selger med det første. Under hvilke betingelser, og til hvem, ja si det...
