Emne: PATETISKE EX-EIERE - GFH Capital

[HåvardK]

Nå, lojo? Fortsatt av den formening at disse driver "helt greit"?

[Jon R]

Nå, lojo? Fortsatt av den formening at disse driver "helt greit"?

Ã… deilig, Håvard, ingenting er bedre enn litt  besserwisser etterpåklokskap når noe som endelig kunne gi litt grunn til optimisme, også denne gangen gikk i dass.   

Heldigvis kan sluttproduktet av en hasardiøs drift bli bra!  ( men selvfølgelig da litt dumt for de av oss som har spådd administrasjon og det som verre er, det viktigste er jo tross alt at vi får "rett " i våre dystre spådommer)

[Jon R]

GFH, gutta som bygger klubben stein for stein?

"By Phil Hay
For better or worse, the Football League will deal with Massimo Cellino. He has polarised opinion, the eccentric Italian, but the integrity of his money and the depth of his moral fibre are matters for the governing body to consider.


If approval comes the inevitable debate will not centre around him. It will focus on the Football League’s Owners and Directors Test and the question of whether its examination is anything more than a box-ticking exercise with narrow legal requirements. But even that is for another day.

Against the grain, resistance to Cellino has softened marginally this past week; not because his dismissal of Brian McDermott feels any less vindictive or because he has sold himself in a coherent, convincing way but because Leeds United as a club are destitute. They owe money to creditors large and small and have an owner, Gulf Finance House, which is building up liabilities to a level where anyone buying the Bahraini bank out requires some level of insanity.

The cost of Cellino’s takeover is estimated at £25m, of which a sizeable sum will be used to deal with pressing debts. In the circumstances, Leeds need a buyer willing to sink that sort of cash into a black hole before the fun and games begin. Vision and planning would be appreciated but at present, United cannot even afford to finish an AstroTurf pitch at their training ground. That’s where GFH’s sustainability leaves the club – down a desperate alley.

So Cellino is the Football League’s responsibility. Closer to home, questions about fit and proper ownership should be aimed at GFH and United’s board. Take any event of the week to 10 days just gone and the underlying story is one of bankrupt leadership, non-existent management and cheap, political maneuvering.

The night of McDermott’s sacking is the best example. According to club director Salem Patel, he and chairman Salah Nooruddin were in the Middle East at the time. David Haigh, the club’s managing director and only other board member, was on a plane between England and Switzerland. On transfer deadline day. On the day when GFH agreed the sale of a 75 per cent stake to Cellino. On an evening when Cellino was swanning around Elland Road, signing death warrants and causing havoc. The men at the top were nowhere.

But absence is a trend when trouble flares in Leeds. Staff at Elland Road have told the YEP that when Enterprise Insurance served its winding-up petition on Leeds last Thursday – a petition delivered direct to the stadium – no representative of the board would come downstairs to sign for it. Too far away, too busy, too spineless. Take your pick. It was left with security and became public knowledge before long.

There is also the matter of non-payment to suppliers, an embarrassing problem which has been dumped in the laps of the rank and file. Emails detailing correspondence between United and certain local companies make for uncomfortable reading: oridinary staff apologising for a situation which is not of their making and trying in vain to explain that they’re only passing on the bad news while receiving threats of legal proceedings in return. “This is the only answer I have,” read one. I spoke to a number of suppliers this week and got much the same message: that the club have been taking liberties with them. “Leeds United are a business with a financial approach that seems to rely wholly on suppliers being Leeds fans,” said one. Most of them are losing patience. The installation of a 3G AstroTurf pitch at Thorp Arch, meanwhile, lies incomplete and won’t be finished until someone decides to pay what’s due. GFH doesn’t intend to.

That stalled project is a more serious problem than it seems. United’s attempt to have their academy classed as category two under the Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP) is dependent on the state-of-the-art AstroTurf surface being laid and usuable. It was part of the audit through which Leeds expected to qualify. As it happens, they will lose more money in funding than the pitch costs to install if their academy is ranked as category three. “It was a no brainer,” a source told the YEP. Or not.

Somebody must be culpable for this and the buck stops with GFH and the board, the supposed conduit between Leeds and Bahrain. First you have Patel, a man who once told me that an article I’d written would start riots across the Muslim world (it didn’t). Then you have Nooruddin, a man whose nephew was seemingly trying to sell shares in United to the Leeds United Supporters Trust two days before Cellino did his deal. A man whose message of congratulations to Cellino last Friday set the demolition ball in motion. A man who tried to force an unwanted player into Leeds’ academy many moons ago.

And Haigh; a man who appears to have spent the past week positioning himself closest to whichever buyer was nearest the finishing line. Last Saturday he was telling people of his plan to pull a new consortium together; by Wednesday he was heard talking up Cellino’s credentials. Poisoned darts have rightly been thrown at Hisham Alrayes, the ex-Leeds director who calls the shots at GFH in Bahrain, but to give Alrayes his due, at least he knows where his loyalty lies.

There are various interests being served here but very few are Leeds United’s. It’s a case of priorities and the club haven’t figured. Nor have their suppliers. And on that basis, the reputation of this three-man board is shot. They have one way of exiting the madness with some dignity – by refusing to cling on to position or rank and accepting that there is little left for them here."

Snarere en steinrøys. Deprimerende lesning.

[Leedsfan]

GFH, gutta som bygger klubben stein for stein?

"By Phil Hay
For better or worse, the Football League will deal with Massimo Cellino. He has polarised opinion, the eccentric Italian, but the integrity of his money and the depth of his moral fibre are matters for the governing body to consider.


If approval comes the inevitable debate will not centre around him. It will focus on the Football League’s Owners and Directors Test and the question of whether its examination is anything more than a box-ticking exercise with narrow legal requirements. But even that is for another day.

Against the grain, resistance to Cellino has softened marginally this past week; not because his dismissal of Brian McDermott feels any less vindictive or because he has sold himself in a coherent, convincing way but because Leeds United as a club are destitute. They owe money to creditors large and small and have an owner, Gulf Finance House, which is building up liabilities to a level where anyone buying the Bahraini bank out requires some level of insanity.

The cost of Cellino’s takeover is estimated at £25m, of which a sizeable sum will be used to deal with pressing debts. In the circumstances, Leeds need a buyer willing to sink that sort of cash into a black hole before the fun and games begin. Vision and planning would be appreciated but at present, United cannot even afford to finish an AstroTurf pitch at their training ground. That’s where GFH’s sustainability leaves the club – down a desperate alley.

So Cellino is the Football League’s responsibility. Closer to home, questions about fit and proper ownership should be aimed at GFH and United’s board. Take any event of the week to 10 days just gone and the underlying story is one of bankrupt leadership, non-existent management and cheap, political maneuvering.

The night of McDermott’s sacking is the best example. According to club director Salem Patel, he and chairman Salah Nooruddin were in the Middle East at the time. David Haigh, the club’s managing director and only other board member, was on a plane between England and Switzerland. On transfer deadline day. On the day when GFH agreed the sale of a 75 per cent stake to Cellino. On an evening when Cellino was swanning around Elland Road, signing death warrants and causing havoc. The men at the top were nowhere.

But absence is a trend when trouble flares in Leeds. Staff at Elland Road have told the YEP that when Enterprise Insurance served its winding-up petition on Leeds last Thursday – a petition delivered direct to the stadium – no representative of the board would come downstairs to sign for it. Too far away, too busy, too spineless. Take your pick. It was left with security and became public knowledge before long.

There is also the matter of non-payment to suppliers, an embarrassing problem which has been dumped in the laps of the rank and file. Emails detailing correspondence between United and certain local companies make for uncomfortable reading: oridinary staff apologising for a situation which is not of their making and trying in vain to explain that they’re only passing on the bad news while receiving threats of legal proceedings in return. “This is the only answer I have,” read one. I spoke to a number of suppliers this week and got much the same message: that the club have been taking liberties with them. “Leeds United are a business with a financial approach that seems to rely wholly on suppliers being Leeds fans,” said one. Most of them are losing patience. The installation of a 3G AstroTurf pitch at Thorp Arch, meanwhile, lies incomplete and won’t be finished until someone decides to pay what’s due. GFH doesn’t intend to.

That stalled project is a more serious problem than it seems. United’s attempt to have their academy classed as category two under the Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP) is dependent on the state-of-the-art AstroTurf surface being laid and usuable. It was part of the audit through which Leeds expected to qualify. As it happens, they will lose more money in funding than the pitch costs to install if their academy is ranked as category three. “It was a no brainer,” a source told the YEP. Or not.

Somebody must be culpable for this and the buck stops with GFH and the board, the supposed conduit between Leeds and Bahrain. First you have Patel, a man who once told me that an article I’d written would start riots across the Muslim world (it didn’t). Then you have Nooruddin, a man whose nephew was seemingly trying to sell shares in United to the Leeds United Supporters Trust two days before Cellino did his deal. A man whose message of congratulations to Cellino last Friday set the demolition ball in motion. A man who tried to force an unwanted player into Leeds’ academy many moons ago.

And Haigh; a man who appears to have spent the past week positioning himself closest to whichever buyer was nearest the finishing line. Last Saturday he was telling people of his plan to pull a new consortium together; by Wednesday he was heard talking up Cellino’s credentials. Poisoned darts have rightly been thrown at Hisham Alrayes, the ex-Leeds director who calls the shots at GFH in Bahrain, but to give Alrayes his due, at least he knows where his loyalty lies.

There are various interests being served here but very few are Leeds United’s. It’s a case of priorities and the club haven’t figured. Nor have their suppliers. And on that basis, the reputation of this three-man board is shot. They have one way of exiting the madness with some dignity – by refusing to cling on to position or rank and accepting that there is little left for them here."

Snarere en steinrøys. Deprimerende lesning.

Til og med Bates er bedre enn dette, dessverre!

[lojosang]

Nå, lojo? Fortsatt av den formening at disse driver "helt greit"?

Jeg syns du er i overkant tolerant hvis metaforen "dårlig regulert diabetes 2" symboliserer "helt greit".

[RoarG]

GFH, gutta som bygger klubben stein for stein?

"By Phil Hay
For better or worse, the Football League will deal with Massimo Cellino. He has polarised opinion, the eccentric Italian, but the integrity of his money and the depth of his moral fibre are matters for the governing body to consider.


If approval comes the inevitable debate will not centre around him. It will focus on the Football League’s Owners and Directors Test and the question of whether its examination is anything more than a box-ticking exercise with narrow legal requirements. But even that is for another day.

Against the grain, resistance to Cellino has softened marginally this past week; not because his dismissal of Brian McDermott feels any less vindictive or because he has sold himself in a coherent, convincing way but because Leeds United as a club are destitute. They owe money to creditors large and small and have an owner, Gulf Finance House, which is building up liabilities to a level where anyone buying the Bahraini bank out requires some level of insanity.

The cost of Cellino’s takeover is estimated at £25m, of which a sizeable sum will be used to deal with pressing debts. In the circumstances, Leeds need a buyer willing to sink that sort of cash into a black hole before the fun and games begin. Vision and planning would be appreciated but at present, United cannot even afford to finish an AstroTurf pitch at their training ground. That’s where GFH’s sustainability leaves the club – down a desperate alley.

So Cellino is the Football League’s responsibility. Closer to home, questions about fit and proper ownership should be aimed at GFH and United’s board. Take any event of the week to 10 days just gone and the underlying story is one of bankrupt leadership, non-existent management and cheap, political maneuvering.

The night of McDermott’s sacking is the best example. According to club director Salem Patel, he and chairman Salah Nooruddin were in the Middle East at the time. David Haigh, the club’s managing director and only other board member, was on a plane between England and Switzerland. On transfer deadline day. On the day when GFH agreed the sale of a 75 per cent stake to Cellino. On an evening when Cellino was swanning around Elland Road, signing death warrants and causing havoc. The men at the top were nowhere.

But absence is a trend when trouble flares in Leeds. Staff at Elland Road have told the YEP that when Enterprise Insurance served its winding-up petition on Leeds last Thursday – a petition delivered direct to the stadium – no representative of the board would come downstairs to sign for it. Too far away, too busy, too spineless. Take your pick. It was left with security and became public knowledge before long.

There is also the matter of non-payment to suppliers, an embarrassing problem which has been dumped in the laps of the rank and file. Emails detailing correspondence between United and certain local companies make for uncomfortable reading: oridinary staff apologising for a situation which is not of their making and trying in vain to explain that they’re only passing on the bad news while receiving threats of legal proceedings in return. “This is the only answer I have,” read one. I spoke to a number of suppliers this week and got much the same message: that the club have been taking liberties with them. “Leeds United are a business with a financial approach that seems to rely wholly on suppliers being Leeds fans,” said one. Most of them are losing patience. The installation of a 3G AstroTurf pitch at Thorp Arch, meanwhile, lies incomplete and won’t be finished until someone decides to pay what’s due. GFH doesn’t intend to.

That stalled project is a more serious problem than it seems. United’s attempt to have their academy classed as category two under the Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP) is dependent on the state-of-the-art AstroTurf surface being laid and usuable. It was part of the audit through which Leeds expected to qualify. As it happens, they will lose more money in funding than the pitch costs to install if their academy is ranked as category three. “It was a no brainer,” a source told the YEP. Or not.

Somebody must be culpable for this and the buck stops with GFH and the board, the supposed conduit between Leeds and Bahrain. First you have Patel, a man who once told me that an article I’d written would start riots across the Muslim world (it didn’t). Then you have Nooruddin, a man whose nephew was seemingly trying to sell shares in United to the Leeds United Supporters Trust two days before Cellino did his deal. A man whose message of congratulations to Cellino last Friday set the demolition ball in motion. A man who tried to force an unwanted player into Leeds’ academy many moons ago.

And Haigh; a man who appears to have spent the past week positioning himself closest to whichever buyer was nearest the finishing line. Last Saturday he was telling people of his plan to pull a new consortium together; by Wednesday he was heard talking up Cellino’s credentials. Poisoned darts have rightly been thrown at Hisham Alrayes, the ex-Leeds director who calls the shots at GFH in Bahrain, but to give Alrayes his due, at least he knows where his loyalty lies.

There are various interests being served here but very few are Leeds United’s. It’s a case of priorities and the club haven’t figured. Nor have their suppliers. And on that basis, the reputation of this three-man board is shot. They have one way of exiting the madness with some dignity – by refusing to cling on to position or rank and accepting that there is little left for them here."

Snarere en steinrøys. Deprimerende lesning.

Til og med Bates er bedre enn dette, dessverre!

Den var vel litt drøy. OK, de har nok undervurdert oppgaven med å drive en fotball-klubb. Mye hadde sett bedre ut om TO-eren med Flowers-konsortiumet hadde gått i boks tidligere. Da de trakk seg virker det nesten som om panikken slo inn hos GFH.

[Leedsfan]

GFH, gutta som bygger klubben stein for stein?

"By Phil Hay
For better or worse, the Football League will deal with Massimo Cellino. He has polarised opinion, the eccentric Italian, but the integrity of his money and the depth of his moral fibre are matters for the governing body to consider.


If approval comes the inevitable debate will not centre around him. It will focus on the Football League’s Owners and Directors Test and the question of whether its examination is anything more than a box-ticking exercise with narrow legal requirements. But even that is for another day.

Against the grain, resistance to Cellino has softened marginally this past week; not because his dismissal of Brian McDermott feels any less vindictive or because he has sold himself in a coherent, convincing way but because Leeds United as a club are destitute. They owe money to creditors large and small and have an owner, Gulf Finance House, which is building up liabilities to a level where anyone buying the Bahraini bank out requires some level of insanity.

The cost of Cellino’s takeover is estimated at £25m, of which a sizeable sum will be used to deal with pressing debts. In the circumstances, Leeds need a buyer willing to sink that sort of cash into a black hole before the fun and games begin. Vision and planning would be appreciated but at present, United cannot even afford to finish an AstroTurf pitch at their training ground. That’s where GFH’s sustainability leaves the club – down a desperate alley.

So Cellino is the Football League’s responsibility. Closer to home, questions about fit and proper ownership should be aimed at GFH and United’s board. Take any event of the week to 10 days just gone and the underlying story is one of bankrupt leadership, non-existent management and cheap, political maneuvering.

The night of McDermott’s sacking is the best example. According to club director Salem Patel, he and chairman Salah Nooruddin were in the Middle East at the time. David Haigh, the club’s managing director and only other board member, was on a plane between England and Switzerland. On transfer deadline day. On the day when GFH agreed the sale of a 75 per cent stake to Cellino. On an evening when Cellino was swanning around Elland Road, signing death warrants and causing havoc. The men at the top were nowhere.

But absence is a trend when trouble flares in Leeds. Staff at Elland Road have told the YEP that when Enterprise Insurance served its winding-up petition on Leeds last Thursday – a petition delivered direct to the stadium – no representative of the board would come downstairs to sign for it. Too far away, too busy, too spineless. Take your pick. It was left with security and became public knowledge before long.

There is also the matter of non-payment to suppliers, an embarrassing problem which has been dumped in the laps of the rank and file. Emails detailing correspondence between United and certain local companies make for uncomfortable reading: oridinary staff apologising for a situation which is not of their making and trying in vain to explain that they’re only passing on the bad news while receiving threats of legal proceedings in return. “This is the only answer I have,” read one. I spoke to a number of suppliers this week and got much the same message: that the club have been taking liberties with them. “Leeds United are a business with a financial approach that seems to rely wholly on suppliers being Leeds fans,” said one. Most of them are losing patience. The installation of a 3G AstroTurf pitch at Thorp Arch, meanwhile, lies incomplete and won’t be finished until someone decides to pay what’s due. GFH doesn’t intend to.

That stalled project is a more serious problem than it seems. United’s attempt to have their academy classed as category two under the Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP) is dependent on the state-of-the-art AstroTurf surface being laid and usuable. It was part of the audit through which Leeds expected to qualify. As it happens, they will lose more money in funding than the pitch costs to install if their academy is ranked as category three. “It was a no brainer,” a source told the YEP. Or not.

Somebody must be culpable for this and the buck stops with GFH and the board, the supposed conduit between Leeds and Bahrain. First you have Patel, a man who once told me that an article I’d written would start riots across the Muslim world (it didn’t). Then you have Nooruddin, a man whose nephew was seemingly trying to sell shares in United to the Leeds United Supporters Trust two days before Cellino did his deal. A man whose message of congratulations to Cellino last Friday set the demolition ball in motion. A man who tried to force an unwanted player into Leeds’ academy many moons ago.

And Haigh; a man who appears to have spent the past week positioning himself closest to whichever buyer was nearest the finishing line. Last Saturday he was telling people of his plan to pull a new consortium together; by Wednesday he was heard talking up Cellino’s credentials. Poisoned darts have rightly been thrown at Hisham Alrayes, the ex-Leeds director who calls the shots at GFH in Bahrain, but to give Alrayes his due, at least he knows where his loyalty lies.

There are various interests being served here but very few are Leeds United’s. It’s a case of priorities and the club haven’t figured. Nor have their suppliers. And on that basis, the reputation of this three-man board is shot. They have one way of exiting the madness with some dignity – by refusing to cling on to position or rank and accepting that there is little left for them here."

Snarere en steinrøys. Deprimerende lesning.

Til og med Bates er bedre enn dette, dessverre!

Den var vel litt drøy. OK, de har nok undervurdert oppgaven med å drive en fotball-klubb. Mye hadde sett bedre ut om TO-eren med Flowers-konsortiumet hadde gått i boks tidligere. Da de trakk seg virker det nesten som om panikken slo inn hos GFH.

Til og med Bates kunne signert et par gode spillere og beholdt noen hvis han hadde brukt penger han ikke hadde slik som GFH!

[HåvardK]

Nå, lojo? Fortsatt av den formening at disse driver "helt greit"?

Jeg syns du er i overkant tolerant hvis metaforen "dårlig regulert diabetes 2" symboliserer "helt greit".

"Jeg syns de hadde opptrådt helt greit inntil denne takeoverfarsen."

Dette skrev du i Cellina-tråden, da. Om GFH, for ordens skyld.

Men jeg skal slutte å gnåle med dette nå. Greide bare ikke å dy meg.

[sportcarl1]

GFH, gutta som bygger klubben stein for stein?

"By Phil Hay
For better or worse, the Football League will deal with Massimo Cellino. He has polarised opinion, the eccentric Italian, but the integrity of his money and the depth of his moral fibre are matters for the governing body to consider.


If approval comes the inevitable debate will not centre around him. It will focus on the Football League’s Owners and Directors Test and the question of whether its examination is anything more than a box-ticking exercise with narrow legal requirements. But even that is for another day.

Against the grain, resistance to Cellino has softened marginally this past week; not because his dismissal of Brian McDermott feels any less vindictive or because he has sold himself in a coherent, convincing way but because Leeds United as a club are destitute. They owe money to creditors large and small and have an owner, Gulf Finance House, which is building up liabilities to a level where anyone buying the Bahraini bank out requires some level of insanity.

The cost of Cellino’s takeover is estimated at £25m, of which a sizeable sum will be used to deal with pressing debts. In the circumstances, Leeds need a buyer willing to sink that sort of cash into a black hole before the fun and games begin. Vision and planning would be appreciated but at present, United cannot even afford to finish an AstroTurf pitch at their training ground. That’s where GFH’s sustainability leaves the club – down a desperate alley.

So Cellino is the Football League’s responsibility. Closer to home, questions about fit and proper ownership should be aimed at GFH and United’s board. Take any event of the week to 10 days just gone and the underlying story is one of bankrupt leadership, non-existent management and cheap, political maneuvering.

The night of McDermott’s sacking is the best example. According to club director Salem Patel, he and chairman Salah Nooruddin were in the Middle East at the time. David Haigh, the club’s managing director and only other board member, was on a plane between England and Switzerland. On transfer deadline day. On the day when GFH agreed the sale of a 75 per cent stake to Cellino. On an evening when Cellino was swanning around Elland Road, signing death warrants and causing havoc. The men at the top were nowhere.

But absence is a trend when trouble flares in Leeds. Staff at Elland Road have told the YEP that when Enterprise Insurance served its winding-up petition on Leeds last Thursday – a petition delivered direct to the stadium – no representative of the board would come downstairs to sign for it. Too far away, too busy, too spineless. Take your pick. It was left with security and became public knowledge before long.

There is also the matter of non-payment to suppliers, an embarrassing problem which has been dumped in the laps of the rank and file. Emails detailing correspondence between United and certain local companies make for uncomfortable reading: oridinary staff apologising for a situation which is not of their making and trying in vain to explain that they’re only passing on the bad news while receiving threats of legal proceedings in return. “This is the only answer I have,” read one. I spoke to a number of suppliers this week and got much the same message: that the club have been taking liberties with them. “Leeds United are a business with a financial approach that seems to rely wholly on suppliers being Leeds fans,” said one. Most of them are losing patience. The installation of a 3G AstroTurf pitch at Thorp Arch, meanwhile, lies incomplete and won’t be finished until someone decides to pay what’s due. GFH doesn’t intend to.

That stalled project is a more serious problem than it seems. United’s attempt to have their academy classed as category two under the Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP) is dependent on the state-of-the-art AstroTurf surface being laid and usuable. It was part of the audit through which Leeds expected to qualify. As it happens, they will lose more money in funding than the pitch costs to install if their academy is ranked as category three. “It was a no brainer,” a source told the YEP. Or not.

Somebody must be culpable for this and the buck stops with GFH and the board, the supposed conduit between Leeds and Bahrain. First you have Patel, a man who once told me that an article I’d written would start riots across the Muslim world (it didn’t). Then you have Nooruddin, a man whose nephew was seemingly trying to sell shares in United to the Leeds United Supporters Trust two days before Cellino did his deal. A man whose message of congratulations to Cellino last Friday set the demolition ball in motion. A man who tried to force an unwanted player into Leeds’ academy many moons ago.

And Haigh; a man who appears to have spent the past week positioning himself closest to whichever buyer was nearest the finishing line. Last Saturday he was telling people of his plan to pull a new consortium together; by Wednesday he was heard talking up Cellino’s credentials. Poisoned darts have rightly been thrown at Hisham Alrayes, the ex-Leeds director who calls the shots at GFH in Bahrain, but to give Alrayes his due, at least he knows where his loyalty lies.

There are various interests being served here but very few are Leeds United’s. It’s a case of priorities and the club haven’t figured. Nor have their suppliers. And on that basis, the reputation of this three-man board is shot. They have one way of exiting the madness with some dignity – by refusing to cling on to position or rank and accepting that there is little left for them here."

Snarere en steinrøys. Deprimerende lesning.

Til og med Bates er bedre enn dette, dessverre!

Den var vel litt drøy. OK, de har nok undervurdert oppgaven med å drive en fotball-klubb. Mye hadde sett bedre ut om TO-eren med Flowers-konsortiumet hadde gått i boks tidligere. Da de trakk seg virker det nesten som om panikken slo inn hos GFH.

Til og med Bates kunne signert et par gode spillere og beholdt noen hvis han hadde brukt penger han ikke hadde slik som GFH!

1 eller  2år till med GFH hade det gått som med ridsdale, klubben blöder och vi har köpt spelare som vi inte betalat för och nu får cellino gå in här och betala direkt

[Leedsfan]

For en jævla gjeng!!

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/sport/football/article-2554848/Leeds-United-Could-things-worse-Massimo-Cellino-faces-meltdown.html

[lojosang]

Nå, lojo? Fortsatt av den formening at disse driver "helt greit"?

Jeg syns du er i overkant tolerant hvis metaforen "dårlig regulert diabetes 2" symboliserer "helt greit".

"Jeg syns de hadde opptrådt helt greit inntil denne takeoverfarsen."

Dette skrev du i Cellina-tråden, da. Om GFH, for ordens skyld.

Men jeg skal slutte å gnåle med dette nå. Greide bare ikke å dy meg.

Så nå er det galt med eiere som SATSER, altså? 

[Sydhagen]

For en jævla gjeng!!

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/sport/football/article-2554848/Leeds-United-Could-things-worse-Massimo-Cellino-faces-meltdown.html

Cellino er rett og slett redningen for Leeds.
Please pass the fit and proper test!!

[HåvardK]

Nå, lojo? Fortsatt av den formening at disse driver "helt greit"?

Jeg syns du er i overkant tolerant hvis metaforen "dårlig regulert diabetes 2" symboliserer "helt greit".

"Jeg syns de hadde opptrådt helt greit inntil denne takeoverfarsen."

Dette skrev du i Cellina-tråden, da. Om GFH, for ordens skyld.

Men jeg skal slutte å gnåle med dette nå. Greide bare ikke å dy meg.

Så nå er det galt med eiere som SATSER, altså? 

ALT er galt. I utgangspunktet. Og det ser jo ut til at du langt på vei er enig nå for tida? 

[lojosang]

Nå, lojo? Fortsatt av den formening at disse driver "helt greit"?

Jeg syns du er i overkant tolerant hvis metaforen "dårlig regulert diabetes 2" symboliserer "helt greit".

"Jeg syns de hadde opptrådt helt greit inntil denne takeoverfarsen."

Dette skrev du i Cellina-tråden, da. Om GFH, for ordens skyld.

Men jeg skal slutte å gnåle med dette nå. Greide bare ikke å dy meg.

Så nå er det galt med eiere som SATSER, altså? 

ALT er galt. I utgangspunktet. Og det ser jo ut til at du langt på vei er enig nå for tida? 

Ikke alt, FKH er relativt veldrevet for tida. Men en potensiell eier som etter 36 forsøk ennå ikke har klart å finne en manager som er godt nok til å få to hele sesonger velger jeg å stille meg sterkt tvilende til.

Men jeg overlevde da som Leedstilhenger med Giftdvergen som manager, så jeg skal klare av denne middelmådige italieneren også.

[Promotion 2010]

GFH, meanwhile, is facing questions over the distribution of shares in Leeds after it emerged that the League has asked for clarification over the exchange of a majority stake between the Bahraini bank and club chairman Salah Nooruddin.

The accounts of GFH published last June remarked on the “placement of majority stake in LUFC to strategic investors.” Those shares are believed to have been acquired by Nooruddin but have since been repurchased by GFH in anticipation of Cellino’s takeover. Nooruddin, a Bahraini businessman, originally bought a 3.33 per cent stake in Leeds through his company, Envest Limited. An ownership statement on United’s official website was later changed to show that Nooruddin’s shareholding had increased to more than 10 per cent.

That statement was altered again last week with Envest removed completely from the list of companies which own more than a 10 per cent stake in Leeds. GFH Capital and Bahrain’s International Investment Bank (IIB) are now named as the only major shareholders.

GFH was asked by the YEP to confirm the exact date of the sale of shares by Nooruddin back to GFH and to comment on whether the relevant stock exchanges in Bahrain and Dubai had been informed of the deal. The bank did not respond.






Dette blir jo bare værre og værre....

Har Noorudin fikset seg selv aksjer uten å spytte inn penger?

[Jon R]

GFH, meanwhile, is facing questions over the distribution of shares in Leeds after it emerged that the League has asked for clarification over the exchange of a majority stake between the Bahraini bank and club chairman Salah Nooruddin.

The accounts of GFH published last June remarked on the “placement of majority stake in LUFC to strategic investors.” Those shares are believed to have been acquired by Nooruddin but have since been repurchased by GFH in anticipation of Cellino’s takeover. Nooruddin, a Bahraini businessman, originally bought a 3.33 per cent stake in Leeds through his company, Envest Limited. An ownership statement on United’s official website was later changed to show that Nooruddin’s shareholding had increased to more than 10 per cent.

That statement was altered again last week with Envest removed completely from the list of companies which own more than a 10 per cent stake in Leeds. GFH Capital and Bahrain’s International Investment Bank (IIB) are now named as the only major shareholders.

GFH was asked by the YEP to confirm the exact date of the sale of shares by Nooruddin back to GFH and to comment on whether the relevant stock exchanges in Bahrain and Dubai had been informed of the deal. The bank did not respond.






Dette blir jo bare værre og værre....

Har Noorudin fikset seg selv aksjer uten å spytte inn penger?

Blakke, kriminelle amatører?  

[Promotion 2010]

Haigh steps down:

http://www.insidermedia.com/insider/yorkshire/110053-

 

[Kontakinte]

Denne Haigh, tror jeg bruker tunga der det smaker søtt!!

[Sydhagen]

Denne Haigh, tror jeg bruker tunga der det smaker søtt!!

Nå har jeg ikke smakt rumpe, men tviler på at rumpa til Cellino smaker søtt 

[h.b]

Denne Haigh, tror jeg bruker tunga der det smaker søtt!!

Nå har jeg ikke smakt rumpe, men tviler på at rumpa til Cellino smaker søtt 

Si ikke det

[DW]

Denne Haigh, tror jeg bruker tunga der det smaker søtt!!

Nå har jeg ikke smakt rumpe, men tviler på at rumpa til Cellino smaker søtt 

Si ikke det

Er vel mest pastasmak

[Blank_File]

Denne Haigh, tror jeg bruker tunga der det smaker søtt!!

Nå har jeg ikke smakt rumpe, men tviler på at rumpa til Cellino smaker søtt 

Si ikke det

Er vel mest pastasmak

Mais! Og mais er søtt! Men litt ekkelt når det er fordøyet.

[DenHviteYeboah]

Denne Haigh er som et såpestykke: med en gang man skal klemme litt info ut av ham, så skvetter han ut av henda dine og slipper unna....herregud for en gjeng med idioter GHF er

[Gufrias]

Haigh er jurist og politiker. To yrker som virker utviklende på såpestykkefaktoren.

[Kato]

Men det skal han ha, han er god å prate i bomull på Twitter.

[Asbjørn]

Haigh has told friends he has been left high and dry by the GFH hierarchy while he has tried single-handedly to keep Leeds afloat by finding new loans and investors. This includes putting £1.5million into the club himself.


The disintegration in relationships since GFH agreed a deal with Cagliari owner Cellino to take a 75 per cent stake has been quick.


It was only five weeks ago that Haigh said: ‘I am grateful for the full and continuing support of GFH Capital.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2577876/CHARLES-SALE-Leeds-United-owners-silent-treatment-managing-director-David-Haigh-stops-contact-GFH-Massimo-Cellino-waits-takeover.html#ixzz2vg3By2Lj
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[sportcarl1]

haigh och noouriddin är säkert trevliga killar, men när det gäller att driva en fotbllsklubb är de rena skämten

[DenHviteYeboah]

Haigh has told friends he has been left high and dry by the GFH hierarchy while he has tried single-handedly to keep Leeds afloat by finding new loans and investors. This includes putting £1.5million into the club himself.


The disintegration in relationships since GFH agreed a deal with Cagliari owner Cellino to take a 75 per cent stake has been quick.


It was only five weeks ago that Haigh said: ‘I am grateful for the full and continuing support of GFH Capital.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2577876/CHARLES-SALE-Leeds-United-owners-silent-treatment-managing-director-David-Haigh-stops-contact-GFH-Massimo-Cellino-waits-takeover.html#ixzz2vg3By2Lj
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Bates var svært fornøyd med hvem han solgte klubben til

[h.b]

Haigh has told friends he has been left high and dry by the GFH hierarchy while he has tried single-handedly to keep Leeds afloat by finding new loans and investors. This includes putting £1.5million into the club himself.


The disintegration in relationships since GFH agreed a deal with Cagliari owner Cellino to take a 75 per cent stake has been quick.


It was only five weeks ago that Haigh said: ‘I am grateful for the full and continuing support of GFH Capital.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2577876/CHARLES-SALE-Leeds-United-owners-silent-treatment-managing-director-David-Haigh-stops-contact-GFH-Massimo-Cellino-waits-takeover.html#ixzz2vg3By2Lj
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Bates var svært fornøyd med hvem han solgte klubben til

Bates sa jo engang at hans plan var å ødelegge Leeds United. Og da greide han kunsstykket i å selge klubben til noen som ikke har midler . Voila deal done

[Leedsfan]

Haigh has told friends he has been left high and dry by the GFH hierarchy while he has tried single-handedly to keep Leeds afloat by finding new loans and investors. This includes putting £1.5million into the club himself.


The disintegration in relationships since GFH agreed a deal with Cagliari owner Cellino to take a 75 per cent stake has been quick.


It was only five weeks ago that Haigh said: ‘I am grateful for the full and continuing support of GFH Capital.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2577876/CHARLES-SALE-Leeds-United-owners-silent-treatment-managing-director-David-Haigh-stops-contact-GFH-Massimo-Cellino-waits-takeover.html#ixzz2vg3By2Lj
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Bates var svært fornøyd med hvem han solgte klubben til

Bates sa jo engang at hans plan var å ødelegge Leeds United. Og da greide han kunsstykket i å selge klubben til noen som ikke har midler . Voila deal done

Det var jo mye bedre orden når han var sjef. For å ta en DHY, jeg sa jo hele tiden at klubben var i sikre økonomiske hender under Bates. Tæring etter næring.. Nå er jo økonomien et STORT svart hull...